← Bytedance Interview Insights
The iterative part was fine, three pointers, done.
Start by clarifying the problem and edge cases, then walk through the iterative solution with three pointers (prev, curr, next), emphasizing O(1) space. Next, explain the recursive solution, highlighting the base case and the recursive step that reverses the rest of the list and adjusts pointers. Finally, compare both approaches in terms of time/space complexity and trade-offs.
Pro tip: During the recursive explanation, explicitly mention that the recursion uses O(n) stack space, which is often overlooked. Also, be prepared to discuss how to handle very long lists where recursion might cause stack overflow, showing awareness of practical constraints.
Confirm the function signature, input/output, and constraints. Discuss edge cases like empty list, single node, and two nodes.
Explain initializing prev as null, curr as head, and iterating while curr is not null. In each iteration, store next node, reverse the link, and advance pointers.
Describe the base case: if head is null or head.next is null, return head. Recursively reverse the rest, then set head.next.next = head and head.next = null.
State that both solutions run in O(n) time. Iterative uses O(1) space, while recursive uses O(n) stack space. Discuss trade-offs and when to prefer one over the other.
Walk through a simple example (e.g., 1->2->3->null) for both solutions to verify correctness and demonstrate understanding.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.