I got the general shape pretty fast but the deduplication tripped me up more than I expected.
Use a k-way merge approach with two iterators, maintaining the current element from each iterator and advancing the one with the smaller value. To handle duplicates, skip any element that equals the last returned value, ensuring each unique element is emitted once. This uses O(1) extra space and leverages the pre-sorted nature of the inputs.
Pro tip: Clarify the iterator interface upfront (e.g., hasNext/getNext) and handle edge cases like empty iterators and duplicate values at the boundaries. Mention that the solution is generic and can be extended to k iterators with a heap, but for two iterators, a simple comparison suffices.
Restate the problem: merge two sorted iterators, remove duplicates, O(1) extra space. Confirm the iterator interface and that inputs are sorted.
Maintain the current element from each iterator. At each step, compare the two current elements, pick the smaller one, and advance that iterator. Skip if the picked element equals the last returned value.
Consider empty iterators, one iterator exhausted, and duplicates across iterators. Ensure hasNext correctly reflects whether any unique elements remain.
Write clean code with clear variable names. Test with cases like [1,2,3] and [2,3,4], [1,1,1] and [1,1], and empty inputs.
Explain O(1) space and O(n+m) time. Discuss alternative approaches (e.g., using a heap for k iterators) and why they are not needed here.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.