DoorDash·Data Scientist·Technical Phone Screen
Jul 2026
DoorDash data science interview focused entirely on marketplace experimentation across three fairly meaty scenarios: auto-applying credits at checkout, duplicate restaurant listings in search, and a restaurant promotions product. No coding, just product analytics and experiment design the whole way through.
- How would you design an experiment to test auto-applying customer credits at checkout by default, and what should the primary metric be?
- What tradeoffs exist between checkout conversion, credit burn, platform margin, and long-term retention when auto-applying credits?
- When the top organic result and the top sponsored result in search are the same restaurant, is showing both listings good or bad for the marketplace?
- If you decide to remove duplicate restaurant listings from search results, how would you test that change and what metrics would cover user experience, ad performance, and overall marketplace value?
- How would removing a duplicate listing affect lower-ranked restaurants, and how do you account for that in your experiment design?
- How would you increase restaurant adoption of the existing fixed-discount promotion feature?
- If restaurants can customize their promotion format rather than using a fixed template, how would you design and test that product?
- How would you compare the new customizable promotion product against the old fixed-template product, and how do you separate incremental lift from cannibalization or adverse selection?
“This one tripped me up more than I expected.” The rest of the author's notes on Data Scientist interview at DoorDash, Technical Phone Screen round, covers how they worked through the question, what the panel pushed back on, and what they would do differently.
View Post