Tesla·Machine Learning Engineer·Technical Phone Screen
Jun 2026
Tesla ML Engineer interview focused entirely on reinforcement learning for autonomous driving, moving from policy optimization theory to reward design philosophy to a live coding problem. Pretty rigorous, they clearly wanted someone who could reason about failure modes, not just implement the happy path.
- What is the difference between PPO and GRPO in the context of modern RL and RLHF-style training? Cover the objective each optimizes, how each handles advantage estimation, and when you'd pick one over the other.
- When would you choose a hand-engineered heuristic reward versus a learned reward model trained from human preferences? What are the tradeoffs?
- Given batched 2D trajectories of shape [batch, num_waypoint, 2] sampled at 10 Hz, implement a vectorized speed-limit penalty in two variants: one that penalizes time spent exceeding the limit, and one that penalizes the magnitude of the excess.
- What goes wrong with your constant speed-limit reward if the actual limit is time-varying, say 50 mph for the first two seconds then 30 mph for the next three?
- More broadly, what happens when the speed limit changes but isn't part of the agent's observation? How do you fix it?
- If you had to keep a constant-limit reward for legacy reasons, how would you detect at training time that the agent is being trained against a hidden time-varying objective?
- How would you extend the speed penalty to also discourage harsh braking near a speed limit boundary, without double-counting the existing penalty?
“I knew PPO cold but GRPO tripped me up a bit.” The rest of the author's notes on Machine Learning Engineer interview at Tesla, Technical Phone Screen round, covers how they worked through the question, what the panel pushed back on, and what they would do differently.
View Post