Two Sigma·Data Scientist·Technical Phone Screen
Jun 2026
Two Sigma data scientist interview, heavy on ML design and statistical rigor. The whole session was basically one long open-ended question about building a signal from Google Trends data, with the interviewer pushing deeper at every step. Felt less like a quiz and more like a research discussion where they were actively probing for where your thinking breaks down.
- You have access to relative search volume data over time plus standard daily stock market data. Design a model end-to-end that uses search data to predict stock prices, covering target framing, feature engineering, model choice, training/validation, and signal evaluation.
- With thousands of stocks and basically unlimited query terms to choose from, how do you pick which search queries to use without the whole thing becoming data snooping?
- Your backtest shows a strong in-sample Sharpe ratio that collapses out of sample. How do you diagnose what went wrong?
- Search volume often reacts to price moves rather than leading them. How would you actually establish that your feature leads returns rather than just lagging them?
- If the firm already runs momentum and reversal signals, how would you test whether your search-based signal adds genuine incremental value versus just repackaging what they already have?
“This is the kind of question where you can sound smart for five minutes and then completely fall apart when they keep asking 'what else.' I started with predicting forward returns instead of price levels, which felt right, but I underestimated how much they'd push on the cross-sectional vs time-series framing.” The rest of the author's notes on Data Scientist interview at Two Sigma, Technical Phone Screen round, covers how they worked through the question, what the panel pushed back on, and what they would do differently.
View Post