xAI·Software Engineer·Onsite - System Design / Architecture
Jun 2026
System design round at xAI for a software engineer role, centered entirely on designing a durable in-memory key-value cache from scratch. Three progressively harder parts, each building on the last. Solid question, genuinely enjoyable to think through, though the large-value optimization at the end tripped me up a bit.
- Design the core structure of a durable in-memory key-value cache: what lives in memory, what gets written to disk on each put, and how does the cache reconstruct itself after a crash?
- What are the trade-offs of write-through persistence, and how do you deal with stale records piling up in an append-only log when keys get overwritten repeatedly?
- If each value is very large (multiple megabytes) but the number of keys is small, how would you change the design so that writes and recovery don't become painfully slow?
- How would you make put and get safe for concurrent access from multiple threads, and what does that do to write latency?
- If a crash can corrupt the tail of the log mid-write, how does your recovery logic tell apart a torn record from valid data?
- When would you trigger compaction, how do you decide the threshold, and how do reads and writes behave while compaction is running?
“This is where I spent most of my time.” The rest of the author's notes on Software Engineer interview at xAI, Onsite - System Design / Architecture round, covers how they worked through the question, what the panel pushed back on, and what they would do differently.
View Post